Vaccine Choice, Trust in Institutions, and the Intention to Get Vaccinated Against COVID-19
Evidence From an Online Experiment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.51.275Keywords:
experiment, coronavirus, vaccine choice, vaccine hesitancy, psychologyAbstract
Amidst the global struggle to achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, this study investigates whether the number of vaccine options (the size of the choice set) predicts the public’s intention to get vaccinated, and whether this effect depends on their trust in institutions – a system in which a collection of actors – from scientists and vaccine developers to public servants and front-line health workers – is working to fight the pandemic and to develop and approve vaccines against COVID-19 and deliver them to the public. Using an online experiment conducted in Japan (N = 600), the study tested whether choice set sizes of 1, 2, and 4 make a difference in the intention to get vaccinated. The study found that the intention was higher when the subjects were given two vaccine options to choose from, rather than offered a single vaccine, when trust was low, but this effect was negative when the subject trusted institutions highly. The study did not find strong evidence to support the effect of presenting a choice set of four. Based on these findings, this study offers nuanced suggestions for vaccine policy.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Manuscripts accepted for publication in JBPA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC-BY 4.0). It allows all uses of published manuscripts but requires attribution.
The CC-BY license applies also to data, code and experimental material, except when it conflicts with a prior copyright. Common courtesy requires informing authors of new uses of their data, as well as acknowledging the source.
